Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Intermethod comparison of the particle size distributions of colloidal silica nanoparticles

Journal article
Authors Jani Tuoriniemi
Ann-Catrin J. H. Johnsson
Jenny Perez-Holmberg
Stefan Gustafsson
Julian A. Gallego-Urrea
Eva Olsson
Jan B. C. Pettersson
Martin Hassellöv
Published in Science and Technology of Advanced Materials
Volume 15
Issue 3
Pages artikel 035009
ISSN 1468-6996
Publication year 2014
Published at Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology
Pages artikel 035009
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/15/3/0...
Keywords particle morphology, gel layer, surface properties, validation, method comparison, particle diameter
Subject categories Analytical Chemistry


There can be a large variation in the measured diameter of nanoparticles depending on which method is used. In this work, we have strived to accurately determine the mean particle diameter of 3040 nm colloidal silica particles by using six different techniques. A quantitative agreement between the particle size distributions was obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electrospray-scanning mobility particle sizer (ES SMPS). However, transmission electron microscopy gave a distribution shifted to smaller sizes. After confirming that the magnification calibration was consistent, this was attributed to sample preparation artifacts. The hydrodynamic diameter, d(h), was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) both in batch mode, and hyphenated with sedimentation field flow fractionation. Surprisingly the dh were smaller than the SEM, and ES SMPS diameters. A plausible explanation for the smaller sizes found with DLS is that a permeable gel layer forms on the particle surface. Results from nanoparticle tracking analysis were strongly biased towards larger diameters, most likely because the silica particles provide low refractive index contrast. Calculations confirmed that the sensitivity is, depending on the shape of the laser beam, strongly size dependent for particles with diameters close to the visualization limit.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?