To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Corruption, inequalities … - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Corruption, inequalities and the perceived effectiveness of economic pro-environmental policy instruments: A European cross-national study

Journal article
Authors Niklas Harring
Published in Environmental Science and Policy
Volume 39
Pages 119-128
ISSN 1462-9011
Publication year 2014
Published at Department of Political Science
Pages 119-128
Language en
Keywords Pro-environmental policy instruments, Environmental taxes, Corruption, Perceptions of corruption
Subject categories Political Science


The aim of this article is to explain cross-national differences in perceptions regarding the effectiveness of economic pro-environmental policy instruments (EIs). Using data for the European Union, it is found that people in the Nordic and the Benelux countries are more likely to perceive EIs as effective instruments while people in southern and eastern Europe are less inclined to do so. Two hypotheses are put forth to explain these differences. First, it is hypothesized that people are less likely to perceive EIs to be effective pro-environmental policy instruments in relatively corrupt countries. Corrupt public institutions waste economic resources and are less efficient. Furthermore, corrupt societies tend to have lower levels of trust, in general, and low compliance with public policy, which also affects the perceived effectiveness of EIs. The second hypothesis is that people are less likely to perceive EIs as an effective policy option in relatively unequal societies because some income groups will not be as affected by such instruments. Furthermore, EIs have been argued to have unfair distributional effects, and unfairness is argued to trigger free-riding tendencies, thus, making instruments ineffective. From a logistic multilevel regression analysis, the results show support for both hypotheses. In relatively more corrupt and economically unequal countries, EIs are considered less effective, possibly affecting the potential for EIs in certain contexts. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?