To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Storage cascade vs. MODFL… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

Storage cascade vs. MODFLOW for the modelling of groundwater flow in the context of the calibration of a hydrological model in the Ammer catchment

Journal article
Authors V. Rojanschi
J. Wolf
Roland Barthel
Published in Advances in Geosciences
Volume 9
Pages 101-108
ISSN 16807340 (ISSN)
Publication year 2006
Published at Department of Earth Sciences
Pages 101-108
Language en
Keywords calibration, catchment, comparative study, flow modeling, global change, groundwater flow, hydrological cycle, hydrological modeling, Ammersee, Bavaria, Central Europe, Eurasia, Europe, Germany
Subject categories Hydrology, Water in nature and society


Hydrological models are the decisive tools to evaluate the effect of global change upon the water cycle. But the applied hydrological models have to be a trade-off between their degree of complexity and manageable structures and data requirements. This paper compares the advantages and disadvantages of integrating a spatially-distributed process-based groundwater flow model in the context of the calibration of a catchment runoff concentration model. The multi-objective optimisation and the GLUE method are used to analyse the performance and the parameter identifiability of both model structures.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?