To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

A randomized controlled t… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

A randomized controlled trial comparing two ways of providing evidence-based drug information to GPs

Journal article
Authors Ingmarie Skoglund
Cecilia Björkelund
Max Petzold
Ronny K Gunnarsson
Margareta Möller
Published in Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Volume 31
Issue 2
Pages 67-72
ISSN 0281-3432
Publication year 2013
Published at Institute of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine
Centre for Applied Biostatistics
Institute of Medicine
Pages 67-72
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2012.75...
Keywords Benefit aspects, drug information services, drug prescriptions, evidence-based medicine, general, primary-care, general-practitioners
Subject categories Family Medicine

Abstract

Objective. To investigate whether tailored evidence-based drug information (EBDI) to general practitioners (GPs) can change the proportion of ACE inhibitor prescriptions more effectively than EBDI provided as usual three and six months after the intervention. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. GPs in southern Sweden working at primary health care centres (PHCCs) in seven drug and therapeutic committee areas. Intervention. EBDI tailored to motivational interviewing (MI) technique and focused on the benefit aspect was compared with EBDI provided as usual. Subjects. There were 408 GPs in the intervention group and 583 GPs in the control group. Main outcome measures. Change in proportion of ACE inhibitor prescriptions relative to the sum of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, three and six months after the intervention. Results. The GPs’ average proportions of prescribed ACE inhibitors increased in both groups. No statistically significant differences in the change of proportions were found between intervention and control groups. Information was provided to 29% of GPs in both groups. Conclusion. This study could not prove that specially tailored EBDI using MI implements guidelines more effectively than EBDI provided as usual. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/02813432.2012.757071

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?