To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Use of patient-reported o… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.

Journal article
Authors Ola Rolfson
Alastair Rothwell
Art Sedrakyan
Kate Eresian Chenok
Eric Bohm
Kevin J Bozic
Göran Garellick
Published in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
Volume 93 Suppl 3
Pages 66-71
ISSN 1535-1386
Publication year 2011
Published at Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics
Pages 66-71
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01021
Keywords Arthroplasty, Replacement, Australasia, Europe, Humans, North America, Patient Satisfaction, statistics & numerical data, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, methods, statistics & numerical data, Quality of Life, Questionnaires, Registries, statistics & numerical data, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome
Subject categories Orthopaedics

Abstract

There is increasing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields like total joint replacement surgery, where pain relief, satisfaction, function, and health-related quality of life, as perceived by the patient, are primary outcomes. We review some well-known outcome instruments, measurement issues, and early experiences with large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures in joint registries. The patient-reported outcome measures are reviewed in the context of multidimensional outcome assessment that includes the traditional clinical outcome parameters as well as disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome measures.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?