To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Marginal Bone Loss at Imp… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Marginal Bone Loss at Implants: A Retrospective, Long-Term Follow-Up of Turned Branemark System (R) Implants

Journal article
Authors Solweig Sundén Pikner
Kerstin Gröndahl
Torsten Jemt
Bertil Friberg
Published in CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH
Volume 11
Issue 1
Pages 11-23
ISSN 1523-0899
Publication year 2009
Published at Institute of Odontology
Pages 11-23
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008...
Keywords periodontally compromised patients, partially edentulous jaws, narrow-beam radiography, fixed prostheses, osseointegrated implants, titanium frameworks, survival, 15-year, association, multicenter
Subject categories Dentistry

Abstract

Background: Lately, presence of progressive bone loss around oral implants has been discussed. Purpose: The aim of this study was to report in a large patient group with different prosthetic restorations marginal bone level and its change as measured in radiographs obtained from prosthesis insertion up to a maximum 20 years in service. Further, it also aimed to study the impact of gender, age, jaw, prosthetic restoration, and calendar year of surgery. Materials and Methods: Out of 1,716 patients recorded for clinical examination during 1999, 1,346 patients (78.4%) could be identified. A total of 640 patients (3,462 originally installed Brånemark System® implants, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) with a follow-up of ≥5 years were included in the study, while patients with continuous overdentures and augmentation procedures were not. Distance between the fixture/abutment junction (FAJ) and the marginal bone level was recorded. Results: The number of implants with a mean bone level of ≥3 mm below FAJ increased from 2.8% at prosthesis insertion to 5.6% at year 1, and 10.8% after 5 years. Corresponding values after 10, 15, and 20 years were 15.2, 17.2, and 23.5%, respectively. Implant-based bone loss was as a mean 0.8 mm (SD 0.8) after 5 years, followed by only minor average changes. Mean bone loss on patient level followed a similar pattern. Disregarding follow-up time, altogether 183 implants (107 patients) showed a bone loss ≥3 mm from prosthesis insertion to last examination. Significantly larger bone loss was found the older the patient was at surgery and for lower jaw implants. Conclusions: Marginal bone support at Brånemark implants was with few exceptions stable over years.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?