To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Problems and limitations … - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Problems and limitations in studies on screening for language delay.

Journal article
Authors Mårten Eriksson
Monica Westerlund
Carmela Miniscalco
Published in Research in Developmental Disabilities
Volume 31
Issue 5
Pages 943-950
ISSN 1873-3379
Publication year 2010
Published at Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation
Pages 943-950
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.0...
Keywords Asperger Syndrome, Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Autistic Disorder, Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Child, Preschool, Comorbidity, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dyslexia, Diagnosis, Epidemiolgy, Humans, Infant, Language Development Disorders, Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Mass Screening, Methods, Prospective Studies
Subject categories Child and adolescent psychiatry

Abstract

This study discusses six common methodological limitations in screening for language delay (LD) as illustrated in 11 recent studies. The limitations are (1) whether the studies define a target population, (2) whether the recruitment procedure is unbiased, (3) attrition, (4) verification bias, (5) small sample size and (6) inconsistencies in choice of "gold standard". It is suggested that failures to specify a target population, high attrition (both at screening and in succeeding validation), small sample sizes and verification bias in validations are often caused by a misguided focus on screen positives (SPs). Other limitations are results of conflicting methodological goals. We identified three such conflicts. One consists of a dilemma between unbiased recruitment and attrition, another between the comprehensiveness of the applied gold standard and sample size in validation and the third between the specificity of the gold standard and the risk of not identifying co-morbid conditions.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?