To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Tackling combinatorial ex… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Tackling combinatorial explosion: A study of industrial needs and practices for analyzing highly configurable systems

Conference paper
Authors Mukelabai Mukelabai
Damir Nešić
Salome Maro
Thorsten Berger
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer
Published in ASE 2018 - Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
Publication year 2018
Published at Department of Computer Science and Engineering (GU)
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Computing Science (GU)
Language en
Keywords Analysis, Highly configurable systems, Software product lines
Subject categories Software Engineering

Abstract

© 2018 Association for Computing Machinery. Highly configurable systems are complex pieces of software. To tackle this complexity, hundreds of dedicated analysis techniques have been conceived, many of which able to analyze system properties for all possible system configurations, as opposed to traditional, single-system analyses. Unfortunately, it is largely unknown whether these techniques are adopted in practice, whether they address actual needs, or what strategies practitioners actually apply to analyze highly configurable systems. We present a study of analysis practices and needs in industry. It relied on a survey with 27 practitioners engineering highly configurable systems and followup interviews with 15 of them, covering 18 different companies from eight countries. We confirm that typical properties considered in the literature (e.g., reliability) are relevant, that consistency between variability models and artifacts is critical, but that the majority of analyses for specifications of configuration options (a.k.a., variability model analysis) is not perceived as needed. We identified rather pragmatic analysis strategies, including practices to avoid the need for analysis. For instance, testing with experience-based sampling is the most commonly applied strategy, while systematic sampling is rarely applicable. We discuss analyses that are missing and synthesize our insights into suggestions for future research.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?