To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Hit but not down. The sub… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Hit but not down. The substance view in light of the criticism of Lovering and Simkulet

Journal article
Authors Henrik Friberg-Fernros
Published in Bioethics
Volume 32
Issue 6
Pages 388-394
ISSN 0269-9702
Publication year 2018
Published at Department of Political Science
Pages 388-394
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12450
Keywords abortion, reductio ad absurdum, Rob Lovering, substance view, William Simkulet, spontaneous-abortion, embryo loss, critique, Social Sciences - Other Topics, Medical Ethics, Social Issues, Biomedical Social Sciences
Subject categories Ethics, Bioethics

Abstract

In his article The substance view: A critique', Rob Lovering argues that the substance view -according to which a human person comes into existence at the moment of conception - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. I responded to his reductio arguments in A critique of Rob Lovering's criticism of the substance view' and concluded that his arguments did not justify a rejection of the substance view. Now Lowering and William Simkulet have both responded to my criticism, claiming that my criticism of Lovering's article did not refute his original arguments. In this article I respond to their criticism and conclude that, while the substance view has some less plausible implications, none of them justify a complete refutation of this view.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?