Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Neopatrimonialism and Democracy: An Empirical Investigation of Africa's Political Regimes

Working paper
Authors Rachel Sigman
Staffan I Lindberg
Publisher University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper No. 56. November 2017
Place of publication Gothenburg
Publication year 2017
Published at Department of Political Science
V-Dem Institute
Language en
Links https://www.v-dem.net/en/news-publi...
Subject categories Political Science

Abstract

One of the most common adjectives used to describe democracy in sub-Saharan Africa is "neopatrimonial". Characterized by strong executives, pervasive clientelism and use of state resources for political legitimation (Bratton and van de Walle 1997), neopatrimonial democracy has been (controversially) associated with a range of (mostly undesirable) social, political and economic outcomes. This paper offers an empirical assessment of neopatrimonialism in Africa's political regimes. We show that, contrary to conventional wisdom, African regimes vary both quantitatively and qualitatively in their embodiment of neopatrimonial rule. Moreover, we find no clear evidence indicating that neopatrimonialism necessarily impedes the advancement or survival of democracy.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?