To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Towards Assessing Argumen… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Towards Assessing Argumentation Annotation - A First Step

Conference paper
Authors Anna Lindahl
Lars Borin
Jacobo Rouces
Published in Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining, August 1, 2019, Florence, Italy / Benno Stein, Henning Wachsmuth (Editors)
ISBN 978-1-950737-33-8
Publisher Association for Computational Linguistics
Place of publication Stroudsburg, PA
Publication year 2019
Published at Department of Swedish
Language en
Links https://doi.org/0.18653/v1/W19-4520
Keywords Argumentation mining, argument schemes, annotating argumentation, annotation
Subject categories Language Technology (Computational Linguistics), Linguistics

Abstract

This paper presents a first attempt at using Walton’s argumentation schemes for annotating arguments in Swedish political text and assessing the feasibility of using this particular set of schemes with two linguistically trained annotators. The texts are not pre-annotated with argumentation structure beforehand. The results show that the annotators differ both in number of annotated arguments and selection of the conclusion and premises which make up the arguments. They also differ in their labeling of the schemes, but grouping the schemes increases their agreement. The outcome from this will be used to develop guidelines for future annotations.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?

Denna text är utskriven från följande webbsida:
http://www.gu.se/english/research/publication/?publicationId=286588
Utskriftsdatum: 2020-02-23