To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

The role of muscarinic re… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

The role of muscarinic receptors in the control of ovine submandibular function

Conference paper
Authors Gunnar Tobin
A. V. Edwards
Published in J Physiol
Volume 555P
Pages C19
Publication year 2004
Published at Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Dept of Pharmacology
Pages C19
Language en
Subject categories Pharmacology

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine which muscarinic receptors mediate parasympathetic responses in the ovine submandibular gland. The effects of selective muscarinic blocking agents on secretory and vascular responses to electrical stimulation of the chorda-lingual nerve were determined and morphological correlates were assessed by Western blotting. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sodium pentobarbitone (Sagatal; 15-30 mg kg-1 I.V., then 0.1-0.3 mg min-1 kg-1 I.V.). The ipsilateral ascending cervical sympathetic nerve was cut to eliminate effects of sympathetic activity and the animals were eventually killed with a lethal dose of barbiturate. Stimulation of the cut end of the parasympathetic chorda-lingual nerve continuously at 2 Hz, or in bursts of 1 s at 20 Hz every 10 s, for 10 min induced similar fluid responses (19 ± 5 vs. 21 ± 5 µl min-1 g gland-1; n = 10) although the protein output was about 50 % greater (P = 0.015; Student's t test) during stimulation in bursts. The vasodilator response was also significantly greater at 20 Hz 1:10 than at 2 Hz continuously as reflected by the fall in submandibular vascular resistance -53 ± 5 vs. -45 ± 4% P = 0.016; n = 10). Stimulation at 8 Hz induced a fluid response approximately three times as large (74 ± 11 µl/min g gland; n = 10) and a protein output 5 times greater than at 2 Hz; the reduction in vascular resistance was -75 ± 3 % (n = 10). Pirenzepine (40 µg/kg I.V.) significantly reduced the fluid response at all frequencies tested (P < 0.05-0.01), most conspicuously at 2 Hz where it was reduced by 85 %, but did not cause any significant change in the protein output or the vascular response. p-Fluoro-hexahydro-sila-diphenidol (4 µg/kg I.V.) in the presence of pirenzepine tended to further reduce the salivary secretion (reduced by 20 % at 8 Hz; n.s.), without causing any further change in the vascular or protein responses. Methoctramine (100 µg/kg IV), had no effect on either the fluid or the vascular response but significantly increased the protein output during the initial few min (2-4) of stimulation at 2 (+170% P < 0.007) and 20 Hz 1:10 (+125% P = 0.014), but not at 8 Hz. Western blot studies employing muscarinic receptor subtype-specific antibodies, revealed distinct bands corresponding to muscarinic M1, M3 and M5 receptors, with a faint band corresponding to the M4 type. Thus, M1 receptors occur in the ovine submandibular gland and contribute to the secretory response to parasympathetic stimulation but have little effect on the vasodilatation. Inhibitory muscarinic receptors seem to be of the M4 subtype, and blockade by methoctramine of neuronal inhibitory receptors causing increases in transmitter release would explain the increase in protein output.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?