Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

DOES ADOPTION OF MULTIPLE CLIMATE-SMART PRACTICES IMPROVE FARMERS' CLIMATE RESILIENCE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NILE BASIN OF ETHIOPIA

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare H. Teklewold
A. Mekonnen
Gunnar Köhlin
S. Di Falco
Publicerad i Climate Change Economics
Volym 8
Nummer/häfte 1
ISSN 2010-0078
Publiceringsår 2017
Publicerad vid Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik
Språk English
Länkar doi.org/10.1142/s2010007817500014
Ämnesord Multiple climate-smart practices, precipitation, temperature, multinomial endogenous switching, technology adoption, conservation agriculture, food security, developing-countries, management-practices, fertilizer, productivity, adaptation, model, honduras, Business & Economics
Ämneskategorier Ekonomisk geografi, Nationalekonomi

Sammanfattning

There is a paucity of information on conditioning factors that hinder or promote adoption of multiple climate-smart practices and on the synergies among such practices in increasing household resilience by improving agricultural income. This study analyzes how heat, rainfall, and rainfall variability affect farmers' choices of a portfolio of potential climate smart practices - agricultural water management, improved crop seeds, and fertilizer - and the impact of these practices on farm income in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. We apply a multinomial endogenous switching regression approach by modeling combinations of practices and net farm income for each combination as depending on household and farm characteristics and on a set of climatic variables based on geo-referenced historical precipitation and temperature data. A primary result of this study is that farmers are less likely to adopt fertilizer (either alone or in combination with improved varieties) in areas of greater rainfall variability. However, even when there is high variability in rainfall, farmers are more likely to adopt these two yield-increasing inputs when they choose to (and are able to) include the third part of the portfolio: agricultural water management. Net farm income responds positively to agricultural water management, improved crop variety or fertilizer when they are adopted in isolation as well as in combination. But this effect is greater when these practices are combined. Simulation results suggest that a warming temperature and decreased precipitation in future decades will make it less likely that farmers will adopt practices in isolation but more likely that they will adopt a combination of practices. Hence, a package approach rather than a piecemeal approach is needed to maximize the synergies implicit in various climate smart practices.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?