News: Mar 16, 2010
It is generally assumed that military technology that is offensive rather than defensive in nature leads to shorter wars. Yet, a new doctoral thesis from the University of Gothenburg shows that this assumption is not correct.
For long, researchers have thought that offensive military technology, such as armoured cars and attack jets, makes it easier to shorten the duration of a war. It is also generally perceived that when the offensive technology is more effective than the defensive technology, it is more advantageous to start a war.
’While this may be seen in some wars where the attacker is clearly superior, it is not true on average. This means that the improved military technology has not resulted in any advantages for the attacking force, at least not in terms of war duration,’ says Marco Nilsson, who recently earned his PhD from the Department of Political Science at the University of Gothenburg.
To investigate the effect of offensive technology on war duration, Nilsson statistically analysed all wars in the state system from 1817 to 1992. Interestingly, he did not find any effect at all.
’I found that, in reality, the potential advantages of attack-oriented technology is limited by for example terrain, technological development, training of military personnel, climate, weather and norms. Due to these limitations, attack-oriented technology normally does not allow a state to run over an enemy as easily as expected. Unless the attacked country collapses right away, the duration of most wars is decided at the negotiation table,’ says Nilsson.
If two fighting countries could sit down at the negotiation table and base their demands only on military capacity, it would be easy for them to reach a mutually acceptable solution to their armed conflict – the stronger would make high demands and the weaker would accept them. Yet, this hardly ever happens in real life. Nilsson’s study of four different wars (the Winter War 1939, the Continuation War 1941-1943, the Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988 and the war between India and Pakistan 1965) shows that states do not always base their demands at the negotiation table on military capacity.
’A major problem arises when a state has offensive expectations that do not match what is actually seen on the battlefield. These seemingly unrealistic expectations can for example be a result of a conviction that God will step in and influence the outcome of a war. Another reason may be that a country for some reason expects its offensive ability to soon improve,’ says Nilsson.
Unfortunately, some states start wars expecting their attack-oriented technology to warrant quick success. Therefore, too much confidence in offensive technology may increase the likelihood of new wars and speed up arms racing, all due to a misunderstanding among decision makers. A better understanding of the potentials and limitations of military technology could lead to a world where many drawn-out and costly wars are avoided.
Title of the doctoral thesis: WAR AND UNREASON. Bounded Learning Theory.
Author: Marco Nilsson, tel. +46 (0)762 24 12 31 (home), +46 (0)31 786 43 18(work)
Faculty opponent: Magnus Öberg, Senior Lecturer, Uppsala University
The thesis was publicly defended on Friday 12 March.
The thesis can also be ordered at: firstname.lastname@example.org
[29 Nov 2013] Analyses of your status updates on Facebook can show if you have psychopathic personality traits. Narcissistic traits can also be discerned from Facebook. These are the results of a new study by researchers at Sahlgrenska Academy and Lund University.
[28 Nov 2013] Master's student, Jonathan Moy de Vitry, from the MSc programme in Innovation and Industrial Management came 2nd place in the national "Nytt&Nyttigt" competition, which is run by VINNOVA and Esbri. Jonathan won the prize for his thesis "Innovating out of the Fishmeal Trap" in competition with 75 other entries.
[28 Nov 2013] The School of Business, Economics and Law at the University of Gothenburg has been granted international AMBA accreditation for its Executive MBA programme. The School of Business, Economics and Law at the University of Gothenburg is thereby the only Swedish business school to have been accredited by the Association of MBAs (AMBA). This guarantee of quality is internationally considered to be the highest level of prestige an MBA programme can get.
[27 Nov 2013] More younger patients survive stroke
Box 100, 405 30 Göteborg